More from this creator
Other episodes by Kitty Cat.
More like this
If you liked this, try these.
Transcript
The full episode, in writing.
The Lizard Squad website once greeted visitors with a tuxedo-wearing cartoon lizard and the message “You’ve been hacked by the Cyber Caliphate.” In some regions, the page even displayed the phrase “ISIS will prevail.” This digital calling card didn’t just announce a technical break-in—it deliberately blurred the line between prank, threat, and political statement. The question that’s haunted the story for years isn’t just who was behind the hacks, but why the website itself became a kind of taunt, shrouded in mystery and designed to provoke maximum confusion and fear.
The Lizard Squad first landed on the public’s radar on August 18, 2014, when a tweet from their account claimed responsibility for taking down the servers of League of Legends, one of the most-played games in the world. Within hours, players across North America found themselves locked out of matches, stuck in login queues that stretched past 20,000 users. This was the first public evidence of the group’s existence, and it set the pattern for their future attacks: high-profile targets, disruption for millions, and a willingness to announce their work openly on social media.
Six days after their debut, on August 24, 2014, Lizard Squad targeted both PlayStation Network and Xbox Live with distributed denial-of-service attacks. The PlayStation Network, which had about 110 million subscribers at the time, and Xbox Live, with roughly 48 million subscribers, both became inaccessible during peak gaming hours. These attacks hit just as families were unwrapping new consoles or logging in for holiday matches. Xbox Live returned within 24 hours, but PlayStation Network struggled with outages that stretched for days. The group’s tweets taunted Sony, mocking them for “not spending the waves of cash they obtain on their customers’ PSN service.”
But the website itself was a different beast. On January 26, 2015, the group hijacked the homepage of Malaysia Airlines. For users in some parts of the world, the official site redirected to a defaced page: a lizard in a tuxedo, the phrase “404 - Plane Not Found,” and a list of Twitter handles. The “404 - Plane Not Found” slogan referenced the previous year’s disappearance of flight MH370, turning a national tragedy into a hacking punchline. Underneath, in certain regions, came the line “ISIS will prevail,” fueling speculation of terrorist motives or alliances. Malaysia Airlines quickly assured the public that customer data hadn’t been compromised, but for several hours, anyone searching for flight information instead encountered the lizard and a chilling message.
This wasn’t the only time the group’s web presence crossed into public spectacle. On December 2, 2014, they defaced the front page of Machinima.com with ASCII art of their logo. They boasted about the takeover on Twitter, calling out “Machinima goons” and claiming the site was “under new management.” Records from the domain’s WHOIS registry showed that, at least temporarily, administrative contacts had been changed to a Russian email address linked to the group. Visitors to Machinima’s homepage didn’t see news about games or entertainment—they saw the lizard, and a silent dare to “do something.”
The group’s attacks extended beyond websites. On December 26, 2014, Lizard Squad attempted a Sybil attack on the Tor anonymity network, introducing over 3,000 relays named “LizardNSA.” Their goal was to control enough of the Tor network to deanonymize users or disrupt traffic. But the attack fell flat: according to Tor relay operator Thomas White, the group only managed to control 0.2743% of the network—barely a blip, the equivalent of a tiny virtual private server.
Throughout these events, the Lizard Squad website and its public stunts became a digital Rorschach test. Was this trolling, hacktivism, or something more sinister? The inclusion of political slogans and references to groups like ISIS heightened fear but left little concrete evidence of real affiliation. In January 2015, the British National Fraud Intelligence Bureau issued an alert to businesses, warning them not to comply with ransom demands claiming to be from Lizard Squad. Cloudflare, a major web security company, published a blog post detailing how criminals had started using the group’s name to send random threats of DDoS attacks—often without carrying them out.
Theories about the motives behind the Lizard Squad website split into three main camps. The first held that the group were “black hat crackers” seeking attention and profit. Evidence here includes their public taunts, ransom demands, and sales of DDoS-for-hire services. For example, Zachary Buchta, one of the group’s known members, was charged with selling such services and taunted law enforcement by adopting the Twitter handle @fbiarelosers.
A second theory suggested the hacks were a form of political performance art or statement. The group’s choice of slogans—especially “ISIS will prevail”—and their mocking of high-profile companies seemed designed to provoke outrage and speculation rather than advance a clear ideological agenda. Julius Kivimäki, another member, explained in interviews that their Christmas Day attack was meant to “embarrass major technology corporations” and “force people to spend time with their families instead of gaming.”
A third, less-supported theory claimed the group was part of a vast cyber-terrorist conspiracy with real operational links to groups like ISIS. This idea gained traction through the website defacement messages and was given a boost by media coverage, but direct evidence for such ties has never surfaced. In fact, Vinnie Omari, a British member of Lizard Squad, publicly denied any connection to global terrorist organizations and stated they never took part in espionage or hacking of any government.
The available facts point most strongly toward the first two theories: a mix of profit-motivated cybercrime and calculated digital spectacle. The group’s choice to publicize their attacks and their website’s content—blending memes, threats, and dark humor—suggests they understood the power of viral fear on the internet. Their attacks on gaming networks, websites, and online personalities were designed to be seen and talked about, not simply to extract money or promote a cause.
But several elements remain deeply unresolved. The real number of Lizard Squad members is unknown. English-language sources commonly cite seven core members, while Spanish-language reporting says the group might have included up to 25 people. Multiple members operated under aliases, and some, like Floyd Fictoor of the Netherlands, have been connected to other hacking sites like Doxbin on the Tor network. The full internal structure and membership list of Lizard Squad have never been made public.
The true origin of many of their attacks is also obscured. For example, on January 26, 2015, when Facebook, Instagram, Tinder, and other services went down, Lizard Squad claimed responsibility on social media. However, Facebook later issued a statement saying their own engineers had caused the outage after a software change—not a hacker attack. This kind of false claim fueled the group’s notoriety and left outsiders unsure which disruptions were real and which were bluffs.
Finally, the Lizard Squad website’s most disturbing element—the use of terror-linked slogans and references—has never been fully explained. Whether these were attempts to mask the group’s real motives, or just ways to grab headlines, remains an open question. Even after investigations and several arrests, law enforcement agencies have not discovered any evidence of genuine terrorist connections.
The most interesting unanswered question is why the Lizard Squad website, for all its technical bravado and meme-laden taunts, chose to walk the razor’s edge between prank and political threat. Were they simply trolling the world, or was there a deeper intent in their choice of symbols and slogans? The site’s mix of humor and menace turned a series of technical attacks into a psychological puzzle that still hasn’t been cracked.