More from this creator
Other episodes by Kitty Cat.
More like this
If you liked this, try these.
Transcript
The full episode, in writing.
Good morning. As of early Friday, October 16, three stories from around the country are worth a closer look. One is a new federal lawsuit that could affect how some California mail ballots are counted. Another is a voting-system failure in Texas that officials say they have worked through. And the third is a reversal at the White House over a planned broadcast of a military execution. In each case, the distinction between what has happened and what might happen next matters.
First, California. On Thursday, the Justice Department filed a federal lawsuit seeking to have the state set aside ballots associated with more than 20,000 voters the federal government suspects may not be citizens. The administration wants those ballots kept separate and uncounted unless the voters verify their citizenship. That is the government’s allegation and request—not a finding that 20,000 people voted illegally, and not an order a judge has granted.
The dispute follows a federal demand that California election officials examine a thumb drive containing names of purported noncitizens. State officials refused that demand. According to Roll Call’s account of the new complaint, the lawsuit does not identify a statute authorizing an additional citizenship-verification requirement for these voters. The Justice Department argues instead that California is facilitating voting by noncitizens, which federal law prohibits. Those are competing legal positions now before a court; the filing alone does not change the status of any ballot.
Why pay attention beyond California? Mail voting is already part of this election, and November 3 is approaching. The case asks a consequential question: whether federal suspicions about a voter list can be used to hold back ballots while eligibility is checked. For now, keep the words ‘suspected’ and ‘lawsuit’ firmly attached to this story.
In Texas, the concern is different: not a challenge to particular ballots, but a backlog in processing voter registrations. The Texas Tribune and Votebeat reported Wednesday that more than half a million registration records had been caught up in an error connected to an update of the state’s online driver’s-license portal. Some of those applications and updates had gone unprocessed for more than a year.
County election workers faced the backlog just as the October 5 registration deadline approached. Some counties got through it quickly; others said problems with the state’s registration system made the work harder. Voting-rights groups have sued Texas, arguing that the backlog violated an earlier settlement concerning registration through the driver’s-license portal. That allegation, too, should not be mistaken for a court ruling in the new case.
The important development is what officials said Wednesday: the secretary of state’s office and the association representing county election officials knew of no county still working through that particular backlog. That does not mean all registration work is finished. Counties are still processing applications submitted by mail and in person. State officials say registrations postmarked or submitted through the portal by the October 5 deadline remain valid for the November 3 election even if processed later. They also say someone who registered through the portal but does not appear on the rolls can cast a provisional ballot; officials can then check the transaction to determine whether that vote should count.
So there is both a repair and an unresolved question here. Workers appear to have cleared the accumulated records, but the failure that created them—and how to prevent another one—remains a matter of scrutiny.
Finally, the White House has reversed a controversial plan to publicly livestream the scheduled execution of Nidal Hasan. Hasan was convicted of killing 13 people and wounding 32 in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had said the military would stream the execution. On Thursday, President Trump said it would not be streamed, while saying the execution itself remained scheduled for December 3 by firing squad. A Defense Department spokesperson told ABC News the president and secretary had discussed the decision and were aligned.
The proposed broadcast had drawn criticism from lawmakers in both parties. An ABC News, Washington Post and Ipsos poll released Thursday found that eight in ten Americans opposed livestreaming this execution. The voices of people who survived the attack add a different dimension. Alonzo Lunsford, who was wounded at Fort Hood, told ABC News that canceling the broadcast brought ‘a sigh of relief.’ Another survivor, Keara Torkelson, said justice did not need to be broadcast to be real.
There is an important qualification to the date: the Death Penalty Information Center says Hasan can still seek review of his death sentence in civilian federal courts, which could delay the execution. The change announced Thursday, October 15, was to the broadcast plan—not confirmation that the execution will take place on December 3.
That is the picture as this briefing closes: a California lawsuit awaiting judicial action, a Texas registration backlog officials say is cleared even as election work continues, and a canceled livestream of an execution whose date remains subject to legal proceedings. Across all three, the next step belongs to institutions still doing their work—courts, local election offices and the military justice system. We’ll follow what they actually do, rather than treat a demand, an assurance or a scheduled date as the final word.