More from this creator
Other episodes by Kitty Cat.
More like this
If you liked this, try these.
Transcript
The full episode, in writing.
When you think of global fandoms, few communities can match the passion, unity, or sheer scale of BTS’s ARMY. With over 40 million albums sold, BTS isn’t just a South Korean boy band; they’re a cultural phenomenon that brings strangers together across continents, languages, and generations. Fans camp outside stadiums for days. Social media explodes during comeback seasons—tweets, edits, art, and streaming parties ripple from Seoul to São Paulo. The ARMY is famous for breaking records, mobilizing for charity, and launching BTS songs like “Dynamite” and “Butter” straight to the top of the charts. But behind the purple wave of unity and positivity, there’s another side: bitter internal feuds, harassment, and questions about who really belongs in the ARMY.
Let’s start with why ARMY is so beloved in the first place. BTS debuted in 2013 under Big Hit Entertainment and clawed their way up from small venues to international superstardom. In 2017, they broke through globally, with albums like ‘Love Yourself’ and headline performances on major American music shows. By 2020, when “Dynamite” dropped as their first all-English single, BTS became the fastest group since the Beatles to earn four number-one albums in less than two years. The fandom’s energy is legendary. In 2017, fans sent over 300 million votes to help BTS win Top Social Artist at the Billboard Music Awards, ending Justin Bieber’s six-year streak. The ARMY’s digital prowess isn’t just about streaming and voting; it’s about organization. Fanbases coordinate donations, social campaigns, and crash online polls with the speed of a professional PR team.
The ARMY’s power isn’t limited to music or numbers. BTS and their fandom have been active in philanthropy. In 2017, BTS partnered with UNICEF to launch the “Love Myself” campaign against violence and bullying, pledging proceeds from merchandise, ticket sales, and direct donations. The campaign went global, raising both money and awareness. During moments of crisis—like the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic—ARMY organized to match BTS’s donations to relief funds, sometimes raising hundreds of thousands of dollars in less than 24 hours. For many, being ARMY means belonging to a community that stands for kindness and action, not just stanning a band.
But that unity has always been more fragile than it looks from the outside. The first cracks appeared as BTS’s popularity exploded and the fandom diversified. One major point of tension is the divide between “OT7” supporters—fans who love all seven members equally—and “solo stans,” who focus on just one member. By 2023, these internal factions had become impossible to ignore. Solo stans are accused by some of “favoritism” and even sabotaging the group’s image by only promoting their chosen member. On the other side, solo stans push back, saying they’re unfairly targeted and that individual appreciation is natural in any large fandom. These arguments often spill out on Twitter, TikTok, and fan forums, sometimes leading to targeted harassment campaigns and mass-reporting of rival accounts.
The most combustible period for the fandom began in 2022, when every BTS member started their mandatory South Korean military service. The news immediately split the fandom. Some fans worried BTS would never truly regroup, while others insisted on patience. As the hiatus stretched on, speculation about solo projects and future plans intensified the solo stan versus OT7 debate. Discussions that once focused on music and achievements turned personal, with accusations of “betrayal” and “not being a real ARMY” thrown at anyone who voiced doubts or leaned too hard into supporting a single member.
The tension wasn’t just digital. In 2024, a corporate conflict between HYBE Corporation, BTS’s management, and Min Hee-jin, CEO of their sub-label ADOR, spilled into public view. Accusations that Min tried to make ADOR independent—paired with allegations of plagiarism between K-pop groups NewJeans and ILLIT—sparked an 8.03% crash in HYBE’s share price. Fans took sides, debating the future of the entire company and, by extension, BTS’s fate. While this was a business controversy, it bled into ARMY discourse, as some worried about management priorities and others accused rival fandoms of fueling the scandal.
The ARMY’s online reputation has taken additional hits from high-profile incidents. In August 2024, member Suga was involved in a drunk driving incident. Both Suga and Big Hit Music issued public apologies. The response from fans was split: some defended Suga and called for forgiveness; others argued the incident was a serious breach of trust. This debate was often less about the facts and more about loyalty—pushing the solo versus group loyalty divide even deeper.
Other incidents have amplified criticism of the fandom’s online behavior. During a November 2025 live stream by the brand Somethinc, the host faced intense harassment from BTS fans, drawing widespread criticism against the fandom for online bullying. Earlier, in June 2020, Suga’s solo mixtape “D-2” sparked discussions about anti-Blackness within the ARMY, after he used a sample from a speech by cult leader Jim Jones. These moments forced fans to confront not just external controversies, but internal biases and the limits of their community’s “positivity” mantra.
Not all internal fractures are about individual members or external scandals. In 2021, a Facebook group called “Team Copyright” filed false copyright claims against BTS fan accounts, leading to their suspension. This exposed vulnerabilities in how ARMY organizes and protects its presence on major platforms—and fueled new rounds of blame and finger-pointing about who let the community be exposed to trolls.
Are these criticisms fair? The answer depends on where you stand. Critics argue that ARMY’s mass-reporting and online campaigns cross the line from passionate support to harassment. Others say the scale of the group makes a few bad actors inevitable, and that ARMY as a whole is unfairly stereotyped. For example, when BTS faced accusations of cultural insensitivity—such as the use of Nazi imagery on clothing and a T-shirt referencing atomic bombings—Big Hit Entertainment quickly apologized, emphasizing the group’s intention to promote unity and healing. Some fans found this sufficient; others said the community needed to do more to address issues like anti-Blackness and cultural appropriation.
The debates within ARMY are far from settled. Questions linger: Can solo stans and OT7 supporters coexist without undermining the group’s unity? How should the fandom respond to real controversies versus online rumors? Who decides what “being ARMY” really means? As BTS is expected to return from military service in 2025 and resume group activities, these questions are only growing louder.
So, with the world watching and the group’s future on the line, here’s the question still dividing millions: When BTS returns, will ARMY unite stronger—or will old divisions threaten the fandom’s golden age?